Decision framing in judgment aggregation

DOI10.1007/s11229-008-9306-xzbMath1140.91334OpenAlexW2151118702MaRDI QIDQ934778

Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly, Josh Snyder

Publication date: 30 July 2008

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9306-x

zbMATH Keywords

Judgment aggregationLanguage dependenceSocial choice theoryTranslation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items (7)

Local supermajorities ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Aggregating with reason(s) ⋮ Lifting integrity constraints in binary aggregation ⋮ Acceptance, aggregation and scoring rules ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Majority rule in the absence of a majority

Cites Work

• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Creative and non-creative definitions in the calculus of probability
• ON POPPER'S DEFINITIONS OF VERISIMILITUDE¹
• POPPER'S QUALITATIVE THEORY OF VERISIMILITUDE
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Decision framing in judgment aggregation