Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(17)- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Representing voting rules in Łukasiewicz's three-valued logic
- The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
- An application of Peircean triadic logic: modelling vagueness
- Arrow's theorem and max-star transitivity
- A measure of distance between judgment sets
- Convex MV-algebras: many-valued logics meet decision theory
- An interactive fuzzy judgment aggregation model for consensus with partially undecided judges
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Algorithmically efficient syntactic characterization of possibility domains
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
- On some oligarchy results when social preference is fuzzy
- Community standards
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
This page was built for publication: Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1945846)