Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2013.09.016zbMATH Open1305.91116OpenAlexW1979555383MaRDI QIDQ2256192FDOQ2256192

Rudolf Vetschera, Wolfgang Weitzl, Elisabeth Wolfsteiner

Publication date: 19 February 2015

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.016

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1104009
• Value Functions When Decision Criteria Are Not Totally Substitutable
• Multi-attribute non-expected utility
• Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization
• Dominance, potential optimality and alternative ranking in imprecise multi-attribute decision making
• Screening discrete alternatives with imprecisely assessed additive multi- attribute functions
• Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3972614
• Choice is a value statement. On inferring optimal multiple attribute portfolios from non-optimal nominations
• On the valuation of alternatives for decision-making under uncertainty

zbMATH Keywords

multiple criteria analysisconjoint analysispreference learningimplausible alternatives

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08)

Cites Work

• Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments
• The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
• Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
• Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting
• Learning about preferences in electronic negotiations - A volume-based measurement method
• Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: an experimental investigation.
• Question selection for multi-attribute decision-aiding.
• Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons
• Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods.

Cited In (4)

• Choice-based preference disaggregation concerning vehicle technologies
• Modeling project preferences in multiattribute portfolio decision analysis
• Best-worst tradeoff method
• How well does the OWA operator represent real preferences?

Uses Software

• UTA Plus
• VisualUTA

This page was built for publication: Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2256192)