Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2256192
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1104009
- Value Functions When Decision Criteria Are Not Totally Substitutable
- Multi-attribute non-expected utility
- Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization
- Dominance, potential optimality and alternative ranking in imprecise multi-attribute decision making
- Screening discrete alternatives with imprecisely assessed additive multi- attribute functions
- Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3972614
- Choice is a value statement. On inferring optimal multiple attribute portfolios from non-optimal nominations
- On the valuation of alternatives for decision-making under uncertainty
Cites work
- Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
- Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods.
- Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: an experimental investigation.
- Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments
- Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons
- Learning about preferences in electronic negotiations - A volume-based measurement method
- Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
- Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience.
- Question selection for multi-attribute decision-aiding.
- Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting
- The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
Cited in
(7)- How well does the OWA operator represent real preferences?
- Modeling project preferences in multiattribute portfolio decision analysis
- Choice-based preference disaggregation concerning vehicle technologies
- On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
- Elicitation of multiattribute value functions through high dimensional model representations: monotonicity and interactions
- The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences
- Best-worst tradeoff method
This page was built for publication: Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2256192)
