Best-worst tradeoff method

DOI10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.097MaRDI QIDQ6122294

Matteo Brunelli, Fuqi Liang, Jafar Rezaei

Publication date: 27 March 2024

Published in: Information Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

consistencymulti-attribute value theorymulti-attribute analysisbest-worst methodtradeoff procedure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. In 2 volumes
• Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
• A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff
• How relevant is the lack of reciprocity in pairwise comparisons? An experiment with AHP
• A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
• The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods
• Elicitation. The science and art of structuring judgement
• Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs
• Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff
• Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions
• On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
• Recent Advances on Inconsistency Indices for Pairwise Comparisons — A Commentary1
• Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
• Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs
• Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application
• Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions
• Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements
• The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements
• A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION

This page was built for publication: Best-worst tradeoff method