Elicitation. The science and art of structuring judgement

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1744534

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4zbMath1386.90005OpenAlexW4293872935WikidataQ57641046 ScholiaQ57641046MaRDI QIDQ1744534

No author found.

Publication date: 23 April 2018

Published in: International Series in Operations Research \& Management Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4




Related Items (17)

Recent Advances in the Elicitation of Uncertainty Distributions from Experts for Multinomial ProbabilitiesAn In-Depth Perspective on the Classical ModelLearning target-based preferences through additive models: an application in radiotherapy treatment planningTesting the effectiveness of debiasing techniques to reduce overprecision in the elicitation of subjective continuous probability distributionsRecommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support systemIterative importance sampling with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in robust Bayesian analysisA stochastic method for exploiting outranking relations in multicriteria choice problemsBest-worst tradeoff methodBayesian design and analysis of two‐arm cluster randomized trials using assuranceCalibrating expert assessments using hierarchical Gaussian process modelsA critical analysis of multi-criteria models for the prioritisation of health threatsIntroduction and overview of structured expert judgementExpert judgement for geological hazards in New ZealandStructured expert judgement issues in a supply chain cyber risk management systemStructured expert judgement in adversarial risk assessment: an application of the classical model for assessing geo-political risk in the insurance underwriting industryExpert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but ScientificThree Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values




This page was built for publication: Elicitation. The science and art of structuring judgement