Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.056zbMath1346.91053OpenAlexW2194199681MaRDI QIDQ321062

Tuomas J. Lahtinen, Raimo P. Hämäläinen

Publication date: 7 October 2016

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.056

zbMATH Keywords

decision analysistrade-offbehavioral operational researchbiasespath dependencescale compatibility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items

Best-worst tradeoff method ⋮ Strengthening `good' modelling practices in robust decision support: a reporting guideline for combining multiple model-based methods ⋮ What causes post-decision disappointment? Estimating the contributions of systematic and selection biases ⋮ A configuration-based recommender system for supporting e-commerce decisions ⋮ Risky choices in strategic environments: an experimental investigation of a real options game ⋮ Taking stock of behavioural OR: a review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus ⋮ On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
• The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods
• Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs
• Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. (With commentaries)
• On the importance of behavioral operational research: the case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems
• Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments
• Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility
• Using a Bayesian Approach to Quantify Scale Compatibility Bias
• Inconsistent Trade-Offs Between Attributes: New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases
• “Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects
• On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods.
• Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees