“Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects

DOI10.1287/MNSC.43.5.640zbMATH Open0890.90015OpenAlexW1990914152MaRDI QIDQ4356643FDOQ4356643

Philippe Delquié

Publication date: 22 June 1998

Published in: Management Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.5.640

zbMATH Keywords

decision analysispreferencesbiasesutility assessment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Individual preferences (91B08) Utility theory (91B16)

Cited In (8)

• Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation
• On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
• Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
• The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences
• Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs
• Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. (With commentaries)

   Recommendations

• The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• State of the Art—Utility Assessment Methods 👍 👎
• “Lottery Equivalents”: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment 👍 👎
• Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: “Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4356643)