“Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4356643
Recommendations
- The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1061889
- State of the Art—Utility Assessment Methods
- “Lottery Equivalents”: Reduction of the Certainty Effect Problem in Utility Assessment
- Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments
Cited in
(12)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1844499 (Why is no real title available?)
- Measurement of preferences with self-explicated approaches: a classification and merge of trade-off- and non-trade-off-based evaluation types
- The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation
- Goal-based construction of preferences: task goals and the prominence effect
- On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis
- Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
- Optimal conflict in preference assessment
- The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences
- Using a Bayesian approach to quantify scale compatibility bias
- Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs
- Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments
- Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. (With commentaries)
This page was built for publication: “Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4356643)
