The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.001zbMath1341.91050OpenAlexW2097922936MaRDI QIDQ2630247

Stéphane Deparis, Caroline Huron, Meltem Öztürk, Vincent Mousseau

Publication date: 26 July 2016

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.001

zbMATH Keywords

matchingpreference elicitationmulticriteria decisionbehavioural decision analysismulticriteria conflict

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08)

Related Items (1)

On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis

Uses Software

• M-MACBETH
• UTA Plus
• VisualUTA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Can a linear value function explain choices? An experimental study
• Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Inferrring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples
• Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Transl. from the French by Mark R. McCord
• Optimal Conflict in Preference Assessment
• Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect
• Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination
• Inconsistent Trade-Offs Between Attributes: New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases
• “Bi-Matching”: A New Preference Assessment Method to Reduce Compatibility Effects
• MACBETH — An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions
• Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis

This page was built for publication: The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences