The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods

DOI10.1016/S0305-0548(97)00014-2zbMATH Open0901.90135OpenAlexW2084737925MaRDI QIDQ1366701FDOQ1366701

Authors: John Buchanan, James Corner 

Publication date: 12 November 1997

Published in: Computers \& Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0548(97)00014-2

Recommendations

• An Experimental Evaluation of Interactive MCDM Methods and the Decision Making Process
• Searching for psychologically stable solutions of multiple criteria decision problems
• Publication:4945549
• A Field Experiment Comparing Anchored and Unanchored Criteria Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

zbMATH Keywords

anchoringinteractive MCDM solution methods

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Cites Work

• Multiple objective decision making - methods and applications. A state- of-the-art survey. In collaboration with Sudhakar R. Paidy and Kwangsun Yoon
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Unified interactive multiple objective programming
• An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming
• An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department
• An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions
• A naïve approach for solving MCDM problems: the GUESS method
• Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey. I: Continuous case
• Experimental consideration of preference in decision making under certainty
• A simplified interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure
• Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization

Cited In (10)

• Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring
• A comparison of two interactive MCDM procedures
• The ``Light Beam Search approach. -- An overview of methodology and applications
• Optimistic NAUTILUS navigator for multiobjective optimization with costly function evaluations
• Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method
• NAUTILUS navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
• Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method
• A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
• NAUTILUS method: an interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the Nadir point
• Best-worst tradeoff method

This page was built for publication: The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1366701)