Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring

DOI10.1007/s11238-017-9608-xzbMath1417.91168OpenAlexW3122826844MaRDI QIDQ1620909

Lukas Meub, Till Proeger

Publication date: 14 November 2018

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145452

zbMATH Keywords

group decision-makinglaboratory experimentanchoring biasheuristics and biases

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items (1)

Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

Cites Work

• Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered
• Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
• Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
• Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
• Irrationality or Efficiency of Macroeconomic Survey Forecasts? Implications from the Anchoring Bias Test*
• Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace

This page was built for publication: Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring