Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring

DOI10.1007/S11238-017-9608-XMaRDI QIDQ1620909zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lukas Meub, Till Proeger

Publication date 14 November 2018

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145452

zbMATH Keywords

anchoring biasgroup decision-makingheuristics and biaseslaboratory experiment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Experimental studies (91A90) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
• Propagation of individual bias through group judgment: Error in the treatment of asymmetrically informative signals
• Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment
• The effects of anchoring an interactive MCDM solution methods
• Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more ``rational players?

Cites work

• Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
• Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
• Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered
• Irrationality or Efficiency of Macroeconomic Survey Forecasts? Implications from the Anchoring Bias Test*
• Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
• Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace

Cited in

(2)

• Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
• Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

This page was built for publication: Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1620909)