Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4418263
Recommendations
- Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
- Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets?
- Substitutability, experience, and the value disparity: evidence from the marketplace
- Are adults better behaved than children? Age, experience, and the endowment effect
- The endowment effect, status quo bias and loss aversion: Rational alternative explanation
Cited in
(28)- Multi-dimensional reference-dependent preferences in sealed-bid auctions -- how (most) laboratory experiments differ from the field
- Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
- Consistent inconsistencies? Evidence from decision under risk
- Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: A comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students
- On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
- Buy low, sell high: price gaps and neoclassical theory
- Market simulation and the provision of public goods: a non-paternalistic response to anomalies in environmental evaluation
- A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders
- Thoughts matter: a theory of motivated preference
- Understanding the reference effect
- Blind stealing: experience and expertise in a mixed-strategy poker experiment
- Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study
- Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoring
- How Endogenization of the Reference Point Affects Loss Aversion: A Study of Portfolio Selection
- Combinatorial auctions with endowment effect
- Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral
- Sunk 'decision points': a theory of the endowment effect and present bias
- Smoothing preference kinks with information
- Taste uncertainty and status quo effects in consumer choice
- The human side of mechanism design: a tribute to Leo Hurwicz and Jean-Jacque Laffont
- Imperfect memory and choice under risk
- Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionals
- Behavioral mechanism design: evidence from the modified first-price auctions
- Staying ahead and getting even: risk attitudes of experienced poker players
- Do trade union leaders violate subjective expected utility? some insights from experimental data
- Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices
- The willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity in repeated markets: loss aversion or ``bad-deal aversion?
- Time for memorable consumption
This page was built for publication: Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4418263)
