Consistent inconsistencies? Evidence from decision under risk

DOI10.1007/S11238-015-9518-8MaRDI QIDQ272154zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Guillaume Hollard, Hela Maafi, Jean-Christophe Vergnaud

Publication date 20 April 2016

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-015-9518-8

zbMATH Keywords

consistencyheterogeneityframing effectspreference reversals

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Experimental studies (91A90)

Recommendations

• Are inconsistent decisions better? an experiment with pairwise comparisons
• How consistent are probability tradeoffs in individual preferences under risk?
• Expression theory and the measurement of apparently labile values
• Ambiguity attitudes, framing, and consistency
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 773974

Cites work

• A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice
• Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
• Preference reversals: the impact of truth-revealing monetary incentives
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice
• Third-generation prospect theory
• Wealth Accumulation and the Propensity to Plan

Cited in

(6)

• The development of consistent decision-making across economic domains
• Choice consistency and strength of preference
• Uncertainty and binary stochastic choice
• Are inconsistent decisions better? an experiment with pairwise comparisons
• Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?
• Is there a plausible theory for decision under risk? A dual calibration critique

This page was built for publication: Consistent inconsistencies? Evidence from decision under risk

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q272154)