Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5477753

DOI10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.xzbMath1137.91550OpenAlexW3124282819MaRDI QIDQ5477753

John A. List

Publication date: 29 June 2006

Published in: Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w9736.pdf




Related Items (24)

Are groups `less behavioral'? The case of anchoringSubjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesisHow Endogenization of the Reference Point Affects Loss Aversion: A Study of Portfolio SelectionEndowment effects? ``Even with half a million on the table!A tax and redistribution experiment with subjects that switch from risk aversion to risk preferenceLearning in the Allais paradoxThoughts matter: a theory of motivated preferenceOn the origin of the WTA-WTP divergence in public good valuationThe willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity in repeated markets: loss aversion or ``bad-deal aversion?Understanding the reference effectSharing the sacrifice, minimizing the pain: optimal wage reductionsUncertainty aversion vs. competence: An experimental market studyAll over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferencesExclusive shortlisting choice with referenceStaying ahead and getting even: risk attitudes of experienced poker playersWhen and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratoryExpected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeralAn index of loss aversionSmoothing preference kinks with informationDeterminants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionalsQuasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economicsBuy low, sell high: price gaps and neoclassical theoryLack of prevalence of the endowment effect: an equilibrium analysisStochastic Superiority Equilibrium in Game Theory






This page was built for publication: Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace