On the optimal composition of committees
From MaRDI portal
Publication:485437
DOI10.1007/S00355-014-0805-ZzbMATH Open1307.91068OpenAlexW3123272991MaRDI QIDQ485437FDOQ485437
Leif Danziger, Ruth Ben-Yashar
Publication date: 9 January 2015
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp4685.pdf
Recommendations
- The unanimity rule and extremely asymmetric committees
- Symmetric and asymmetric committees
- Biased experts, majority rule, and the optimal composition of committee
- Optimal decision rules for fixed-size committees in polychotomous choice situations
- Optimum committee size: quality-versus-quantity dilemma
Cites Work
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Symmetric and asymmetric committees
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- The Optimal Decision Rule for Fixed-Size Committees in Dichotomous Choice Situations: The General Result
- Monotonicity in Condorcet's jury theorem with dependent voters
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Deliberative voting
- Extending the Condorcet jury theorem to a general dependent jury
- Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
- First and second best voting rules in committees
- The Condorcet jur(ies) theorem
Cited In (9)
- The capacity of a committee
- The unanimity rule and extremely asymmetric committees
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ranking committees, income streams or multisets
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Optimum committee size: quality-versus-quantity dilemma
- Optimal group composition for efficient division of labor
- The stability of decision making in committees: the one-core
- Specialization and partisanship in committee search
This page was built for publication: On the optimal composition of committees
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q485437)
