What is a reasonable argumentation semantics?

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21MaRDI QIDQ5172623zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sarah Alice Gaggl, Sebastian Rudolph, Michaël Thomazo

Publication date 4 February 2015

Published in Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationcomplexityexpressivenessinvariance under modifications

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• Computational Complexity of Semi-stable Semantics in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Parametric properties of ideal semantics
• Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation

Cites work

• A knowledge-based approach to adversarial decision making
• Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Coherence in finite argument systems.
• Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
• Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Cited in

(21)

• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Parametric properties of ideal semantics
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics
• Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics
• The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited
• Partial semantics of argumentation
• Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics
• Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1974015 (Why is no real title available?)
• General directionality and the local behavior of argumentation semantics
• A categorical approach to the semantics of argumentation
• Paracoherent answer set semantics meets argumentation frameworks
• Defense semantics of argumentation: encoding reasons for accepting arguments
• Partial semantics of argumentation: basic properties and empirical
• Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
• Inference from Controversial Arguments
• On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation

This page was built for publication: What is a reasonable argumentation semantics?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5172623)