What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5172623
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21zbMath1432.68440OpenAlexW806912432MaRDI QIDQ5172623
Sebastian Rudolph, Sarah A. Gaggl, Michaël Thomazo
Publication date: 4 February 2015
Published in: Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_21
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation
- Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A knowledge-based approach to adversarial decision making
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
This page was built for publication: What Is a Reasonable Argumentation Semantics?
