Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2302776
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2019.07.006zbMATH Open1468.68213OpenAlexW2964926349MaRDI QIDQ2302776FDOQ2302776
Nico Potyka, Anthony Hunter, Sylwia Polberg
Publication date: 26 February 2020
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/124531/1/epistemic_meta_final.pdf
Recommendations
- Learning constraints for the epistemic graphs approach to argumentation
- Updating Epistemic Logic Programs
- A model for updates in a multi-agent setting
- Soft evidential update for probabilistic multiagent systems
- Polynomial-time updates of epistemic states in a fragment of probabilistic epistemic argumentation
- Dynamic epistemic logic in update logic
- Efficient reasoning in multiagent epistemic logics
- Knowledge representation and update in hierarchies of graphs
- Knowledge representation and update in hierarchies of graphs
- Updating probabilistic epistemic states in persuasion dialogues
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A survey of non-prioritized belief revision
- A distance measure for bounding probabilistic belief change
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Conditionals in nonmonotonic reasoning and belief revision. Considering conditionals as agents
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Analysing inconsistent information using distance-based measures
- Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation
- A Parametrized Ranking-Based Semantics for Persuasion
- Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
- Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
- Updating probabilistic epistemic states in persuasion dialogues
- Probabilistic Belief Revision via Similarity of Worlds Modulo Evidence
This page was built for publication: Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2302776)
