Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2401637
DOI10.1016/j.ic.2017.01.006zbMath1372.68236OpenAlexW2748688284MaRDI QIDQ2401637
Claudio Andrés Alessio, Gustavo Adrián Bodanza
Publication date: 4 September 2017
Published in: Information and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2017.01.006
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
- Formalizing nonmonotonic reasoning systems
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A skeptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networks
- Closure and Consistency In Logic-Associated Argumentation
- Reinstatement and the Requirement of Maximal Specificity in Argument Systems
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Computing Generalized Specificity
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
- Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
This page was built for publication: Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement
