Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation

DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXI046MaRDI QIDQ3371152zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Henry Prakken

Publication date 21 February 2006

Published in Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exi046

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationpersuasiondialogue gamesdefeasible reasoning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory for games (91A35) Logic of natural languages (03B65) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759380
• A Formal General Setting for Dialogue Protocols
• Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues

Cited in

(31)

• Extracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its Quality
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
• Lakatos-style collaborative mathematics through dialectical, structured and abstract argumentation
• Abduction in argumentation frameworks
• Meaning and dialogue coherence: A proof-theoretic investigation
• Towards verification of dialogue protocols: a mathematical model
• Negotiation and persuasion among agents
• More on non-cooperation in dialogue logic
• Automatic knowledge generation for a persuasion dialogue system with enthymemes
• Preferences in artificial intelligence
• Philosophical reflections on argument strength and gradual acceptability
• A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues
• Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of Argumentation
• Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentation
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
• An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol
• The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
• A Two-Phase Dialogue Game for Skeptical Preferred Semantics
• A defeasible reasoning model of inductive concept learning from examples and communication
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759380 (Why is no real title available?)
• Towards a sound and complete dialogue system for handling enthymemes
• Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues
• Argumentation theory and decision aiding
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic
• Dialogue Games as Foundation of Fuzzy Logics
• A labeled argumentation framework

This page was built for publication: Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3371152)