Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues

DOI10.3233/AIC-190622zbMATH Open1464.68368OpenAlexW2969078785MaRDI QIDQ5145459FDOQ5145459

Juan Carlos Nieves

Publication date: 20 January 2021

Published in: AI Communications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/aic-190622

Recommendations

• Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing
• Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences
• Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
• A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues
• Strategic dialogical argumentation using multi-criteria decision making with application to epistemic and emotional aspects of arguments

zbMATH Keywords

nonmonotonic reasoninglogic programmingstrategic argumentationgoal reasoningformal dialogues

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic programming (68N17) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• The well-founded semantics for general logic programs
• Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
• Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints
• Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
• A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues
• Transformation-based bottom-up computation of the well-founded model
• A general theory of confluent rewriting systems for logic programming and its applications
• Semantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approach
• A possibilistic argumentation decision making framework with default reasoning
• The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (1)

• Concept Lattices

This page was built for publication: Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145459)