A Two-Phase Dialogue Game for Skeptical Preferred Semantics

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_41MaRDI QIDQ2835904zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Z. Shams, Nir Oren

Publication date 30 November 2016

Published in Logics in Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/2164/7757

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Economics of information (91B44)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759381
• Discussion games for preferred semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks
• A discussion game for grounded semantics
• A discussion game for the grounded semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks
• Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
• Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
• Dialogue games for argumentation frameworks with necessities
• Dialogue games for inconsistent and biased information

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1844506 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Two-Phase Dialogue Game for Skeptical Preferred Semantics
• Logics in Artificial Intelligence
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Preferred semantics as Socratic discussion
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks

Cited in

(7)

• An argument game for stable semantics
• Dialogue games for argumentation frameworks with necessities
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759381 (Why is no real title available?)
• A discussion game for grounded semantics
• A Two-Phase Dialogue Game for Skeptical Preferred Semantics
• Dialogue games for inconsistent and biased information
• Logical dialogues with explicit preference profiles and strategy selection

This page was built for publication: A Two-Phase Dialogue Game for Skeptical Preferred Semantics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2835904)