A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2447172
DOI10.1016/j.jal.2013.08.004zbMath1327.68264OpenAlexW2101682716MaRDI QIDQ2447172
Artur S. d'Avila Garcez, Dov M. Gabbay, Luís C. Lamb
Publication date: 24 April 2014
Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2013.08.004
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Meta-interpretive learning of higher-order dyadic datalog: predicate invention revisited
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Argument based machine learning
- How to reason defeasibly
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks
- Fibring argumentation frames
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus
- Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-symbolic Learning Systems
- Neural-Symbolic Cognitive Reasoning
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I)
- The Independent Choice Logic and Beyond
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
This page was built for publication: A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
