Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2017.01.013MaRDI QIDQ2406902zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Maximiliano C. D. Budán, Maria Laura Cobo, Diego C. Martinez, Guillermo R. Simari

Publication date 4 October 2017

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01874

zbMATH Keywords

bipolaritydynamic argumentation modelshuman-like reasoningtemporal argumentationtimed interval-based semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Abstract: A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arguments, the outcome associated with a TAF will vary over time. In this work we introduce an extension of TAF adding the capability of modeling a support relation between arguments. In this sense, the resulting framework provides a suitable model for different time-dependent issues. Thus, the main contribution here is to provide an enhanced framework for modeling a positive (support) and negative (attack) interaction varying over time, which are relevant in many real-world situations. This leads to a Timed Bipolar Argumentation Framework (T-BAF), where classical argument extensions can be defined. The proposal aims at advancing in the integration of temporal argumentation in different application domain.

Recommendations

• Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
• Timed Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: A Simple Translation-Based Approach
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation
• Temporal defeasible reasoning

Cites work

• An axiomatic approach to support in argumentation
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• Integrating argumentation and sentiment analysis for mining opinions from Twitter
• Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals
• Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications
• Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Ramification analysis using causal mapping
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework
• Temporal defeasible reasoning

Cited in

(6)

• Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
• Focusing the argumentative process: neighborhood-based semantics in abstract argumentation
• Modeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworks
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Neighborhood-based argumental community support in the context of multi-topic debates
• Temporal duration-based probabilistic argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2406902)