Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_3MaRDI QIDQ2915055zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ofer Arieli

Publication date 21 September 2012

Published in Logics in Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_3

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• On the acceptance of loops in argumentation frameworks
• Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• A logical account of formal argumentation
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack

Cites work

• A logical account of formal argumentation
• Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Semi-stable semantics
• Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics

Cited in

(17)

• Introducing a tool for concurrent argumentation
• Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
• A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
• Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility
• Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
• A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
• A Common Computational Framework for Semiring-based Argumentation Systems
• On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
• Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
• On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework
• A brief introduction to the Shkop approach to conflict resolution in formal argumentation
• Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
• Being Consistent About Inconsistency: Toward the Rational Fusing of Inconsistent Propositional Logic Bases
• Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks
• On naive labellings -- realizability, construction and patterns of redundancy
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
• Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks

This page was built for publication: Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2915055)