Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5098740
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_2OpenAlexW3013131911MaRDI QIDQ5098740FDOQ5098740
Authors: Ryuta Arisaka, Takayuki Ito 
Publication date: 30 August 2022
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05730
Recommendations
- Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- A first approach to argumentation label functions
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Modal logic for philosophers
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- How Agents Alter Their Beliefs After an Argumentation-Based Dialogue
- Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
- An equational approach to the merging of argumentation networks
- A Hasse diagram for weighted sceptical semantics with a unique-status grounded semantics
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates
This page was built for publication: Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5098740)
