Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5098740
Recommendations
- Graded labellings for abstract argumentation
- Labellings for assumption-based and abstract argumentation
- A first approach to argumentation label functions
- On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation
- Reduced meet over labelling-based semantics in abstract argumentation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1748069 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243383 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3073037 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- A Hasse diagram for weighted sceptical semantics with a unique-status grounded semantics
- A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
- An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates
- An equational approach to the merging of argumentation networks
- Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
- How Agents Alter Their Beliefs After an Argumentation-Based Dialogue
- Modal logic for philosophers
- On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
This page was built for publication: Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5098740)
