An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_21MaRDI QIDQ2851981zbMATHOpenAlexDBLPWikidataFDO

Authors Pietro Baroni, Marco Romano, Francesca Toni, Marco Aurisicchio, Giorgio Bertanza

Publication date 4 October 2013

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_21

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationdesign rationaleIBIS

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42) Computing methodologies for information systems (hypertext navigation, interfaces, decision support, etc.) (68U35)

Recommendations

• Modelling support relations between arguments in debates
• Evaluating dialectical structures
• Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1728342
• Natural language arguments: a combined approach

Cited in

(5)

• Open-mindedness of gradual argumentation semantics
• Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
• Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scales
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1728342 (Why is no real title available?)
• Opposition Frameworks

This page was built for publication: An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2851981)