On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework

DOI10.1080/11663081.2018.1457255MaRDI QIDQ4685531zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Badran Raddaoui

Publication date 9 October 2018

Published in Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1457255

zbMATH Keywords

inconsistency measurespropositional logicdeductive argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Measuring disagreement in argumentation graphs
• Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1983150
• QUANTIFICATION OF CONFLICT IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER FRAMEWORK: A NEW APPROACH
• A relaxation of internal conflict and defence in weighted argumentation frameworks
• Getting consensus through a context-based argumentation framework
• A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory
• An inference procedure for conflict models

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1859326 (Why is no real title available?)
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• A syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases
• A theory of diagnosis from first principles
• Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints
• Analysing inconsistent first-order knowledgebases
• Classifications for inconsistent theories
• Computational approaches to finding and measuring inconsistency in arbitrary knowledge bases
• Computing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics
• Distance-based measures of inconsistency
• How Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic Approach
• Inconsistency Tolerance
• Inconsistency measurement based on variables in minimal unsatisfiable subsets
• Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics
• MEASURING INCONSISTENCY IN A NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION RULE SET BASED ON SNORT
• Measures of inconsistency and defaults
• Measuring and repairing inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases
• Measuring coherence using LP-models
• Measuring inconsistency
• Measuring inconsistency through minimal proofs
• Measuring the blame of each formula for inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values
• Quantifying conflicts in propositional logic through prime implicates
• Responsibility for inconsistency
• Revisiting postulates for inconsistency measures
• Stream-based inconsistency measurement
• Using Shapley inconsistency values for distributed information systems with uncertainty

Cited in

(7)

• A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory
• On measuring inconsistency using maximal consistent sets
• Measuring disagreement in argumentation graphs
• Quantifying conflicts in propositional logic through prime implicates
• Measuring disagreement among knowledge bases
• Localising iceberg inconsistencies
• Measuring inconsistency in argument graphs

This page was built for publication: On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4685531)