Measuring inconsistency through minimal proofs
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(22)- Measuring inconsistency with constraints for propositional knowledge bases
- Analysing inconsistent information using distance-based measures
- Quantifying conflicts in propositional logic through prime implicates
- Using inconsistency measures for estimating reliability
- Measuring and repairing inconsistency in knowledge bases with graded truth
- The degree of conflict between formulas in an inconsistent knowledge base
- Localising iceberg inconsistencies
- Measuring inconsistency with many-valued logics
- On the expressivity of inconsistency measures
- Measuring the blame of each formula for inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases
- Measuring inconsistency through subformula forgetting
- Using Shapley inconsistency values for distributed information systems with uncertainty
- Inconsistency measurement based on variables in minimal unsatisfiable subsets
- Computational approaches to finding and measuring inconsistency in arbitrary knowledge bases
- On the measure of conflicts: an argumentation-based framework
- Formulas free from inconsistency: an atom-centric characterization in Priest's minimally inconsistent LP
- Distance-based measures of inconsistency
- A reasoning platform based on the MI Shapley inconsistency value
- On the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency values
- A syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases
- Identifying roles of formulas in inconsistency under Priest's minimally inconsistent logic of paradox
- Responsibility for inconsistency
This page was built for publication: Measuring inconsistency through minimal proofs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5326427)