The complexity of the pigeonhole principle
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1343166
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(33)- The complexity of the stamp folding problem
- An exponential lower bound to the size of bounded depth frege proofs of the pigeonhole principle
- Bounds in the theory of finite covers
- Improved bounds on the weak pigeonhole principle and infinitely many primes from weaker axioms
- The complexity of the Hajós calculus for planar graphs
- The Complexity of Propositional Proofs
- Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle
- Some properties of pigeon-hole formulas
- Proof complexity of non-classical logics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5530365 (Why is no real title available?)
- The Pigeonhole Principle and Fragments of Arithmetic
- Proof complexity and beyond. Abstracts from the workshop held March 24--29, 2024
- Extended Nullstellensatz proof systems
- Circuit principles and weak pigeonhole variants
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 176196 (Why is no real title available?)
- An exponential separation between the parity principle and the pigeonhole principle
- Non-clausal redundancy properties
- Bounded-Depth Frege Complexity of Tseitin Formulas for All Graphs
- Covered clauses are not propagation redundant
- The independence of the modulo \(p\) counting principles
- On the correspondence between arithmetic theories and propositional proof systems – a survey
- The proof complexity of linear algebra
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2087215 (Why is no real title available?)
- NEW RELATIONS AND SEPARATIONS OF CONJECTURES ABOUT INCOMPLETENESS IN THE FINITE DOMAIN
- A generalization of the second incompleteness theorem and some exceptions to it
- Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
- Count\((q)\) versus the pigeon-hole principle
- Random resolution refutations
- Tight rank lower bounds for the Sherali-Adams proof system
- Bounded-depth Frege complexity of Tseitin formulas for all graphs
- Simplified lower bounds for propositional proofs
- \(\text{Count}(q)\) does not imply \(\text{Count}(p)\)
- Tractability of cut-free Gentzen type propositional calculus with permutation inference
This page was built for publication: The complexity of the pigeonhole principle
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1343166)