Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:484932
DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0280-6zbMATH Open1310.03023OpenAlexW2080922150MaRDI QIDQ484932FDOQ484932
Authors: Lorenz Demey
Publication date: 8 January 2015
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/390141
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Modal logic
- Logics of communication and change
- Logical dynamics of information and interaction
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Knowledge Puzzles
- Information, trade and common knowledge
- Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs
- Agreeing to disagree
- Reasoning about knowledge and probability
- Some extensions of a claim of Aumann in an axiomatic model of knowledge
- We can't disagree forever
- Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic
- Communication, consensus, and knowledge
- Some remarks on the model theory of epistemic plausibility models
- Contemporary epistemic logic and the Lockean thesis
- Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment
- Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic
- Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors
- Sur le théorème de Zorn
- Characterizing the common prior assumption.
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Toward a dynamic logic of questions
- Agreement theorems in dynamic-epistemic logic
Cited In (15)
- Lexicographic agreeing to disagree and perfect equilibrium
- ``Agreeing to disagree type results: a decision-theoretic approach.
- Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures
- Contemporary epistemic logic and the Lockean thesis
- Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic
- Approximating agreeing to disagree results with common \(p\)-beliefs
- Logic and probabilistic update
- Agreement theorems for self-locating belief
- Agreement theorems in dynamic-epistemic logic. Extended abstract
- Agreement theorems in dynamic-epistemic logic
- Counterfactuals in ``agreeing to disagree type results
- An ordered credibility contrast semantics for finite probability agreement
- On logic of belief-disagreement among agents
- Dynamic logics of evidence-based beliefs
- Logical dynamics of evidence
This page was built for publication: Agreeing to disagree in probabilistic dynamic epistemic~logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484932)