Disagreement and evidential attenuation

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12050zbMATH Open1336.03013OpenAlexW2169138333MaRDI QIDQ2807325FDOQ2807325

Authors: Maria Lasonen-Aarnio 

Publication date: 20 May 2016

Published in: Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101801

Recommendations

• An optimality-argument for equal weighting
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting
• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective
• How to resolve doxastic disagreement

zbMATH Keywords

peer disagreementcredence functions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Cites Work

• Disagreement and evidential attenuation

Cited In (13)

• Inattention and belief polarization
• Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement
• Might-beliefs and asymmetric disagreement
• Distrust in experts and the origins of disagreement
• A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement
• CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
• Disagreement and evidential attenuation
• Resolving peer disagreements through imprecise probabilities
• Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective
• A pragmatic argument against equal weighting
• Dilemmic epistemology
• Believing things unknown
• The disagreement power of an adversary

This page was built for publication: Disagreement and evidential attenuation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2807325)