Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
The authors present arguments against the following recommendation to a decision maker: form your own probability distribution by combining the opinions of a number of experts in such a way as to preserve any form of expert agreement regarding the indepence of the events of interest. It is shown that for probability spaces containing at least five points a large class of seemingly reasonable combination methods excludes all independence preserving formulas except those which pick a single expert. In the case where at most four alternatives are present, the same conditions admit a richer variety of non-dictatorial methods which are also characterized.
- Peer disagreement and independence preservation
- Independence preservation in expert judgment synthesis
- Aggregating subjective probabilities: Some limitative theorems
- Coherent combination of experts' opinions. (With discussion)
- Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. With comments, and a rejoinder by the authors
- Aggregating subjective probabilities: Some limitative theorems
- Characterization of externally Bayesian pooling operators
- Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources
- Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3905624 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3288322 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lehrer and the consensus proposal
- Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
- On functional equations and measures of information. II
- Pooling operators with the marginalization property
- Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga
- Reliability (and Fault Tree) Analysis Using Expert Opinions
- Uniqueness theorems for a general class of functional equations
- Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else's Opinion
- A functional equation arising in multi-agent statistical decision theory
- Probabilistic opinion pooling with imprecise probabilities
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- Learning and pooling, pooling and learning
- Probability aggregation methods in geoscience
- Combining experts' causal judgments
- Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree
- Introduction and overview of structured expert judgement
- How to resolve doxastic disagreement
- The joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of belief
- The information geometry of Bregman divergences and some applications in multi-expert reasoning
- A foundational approach to generalising the maximum entropy inference process to the multi-agent context
- Multiple Probability Assessments by Dependent Experts
- Dating Hypatia's birth: a probabilistic model
- Peer disagreement and independence preservation
- Aggregating expert judgement
- Independence preservation in expert judgment synthesis
- Aggregating causal judgments
This page was built for publication: Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1089692)
