Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1600982
DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00226-0zbMATH Open1008.91029OpenAlexW1966343351MaRDI QIDQ1600982FDOQ1600982
Authors: D. U. Lior, W. J. Hurley 
Publication date: 16 June 2002
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00226-0
Recommendations
- Aggregating preference rankings: An AHP‐based approach
- Group decision making under multiple criteria. Methods and applications
- Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
- Group preference aggregation with the AHP -- implications for multiple-issue agendas
- Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
Cites Work
- Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Essential Completeness of the Class of Generalized Sequential Probability Ratio Tests
- Combining expert judgment by hierarchical modeling: An application to physician staffing
- Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making
- Limits for the Precision and Value of Information from Dependent Sources
- Multiple Probability Assessments by Dependent Experts
Cited In (4)
- DETERMINING AGGREGATE CRITERIA WEIGHTS FROM CRITERIA RANKINGS BY A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS
- Aggregating predictions from experts: a review of statistical methods, experiments, and applications
- Optimization problems with flexible objectives: a general modeling approach and applications
- Trimming extreme reports in preference aggregation
This page was built for publication: Combining expert judgment: On the performance of trimmed mean vote aggregation procedures in the presence of strategic voting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1600982)
