An equivalence between two approaches to limits of local fields
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Marc Krasner proposed a theory of limits of local fields in which one relates the extensions of a local field to the extensions of a sequence of related local fields. The key ingredient in his approach was the notion of valued hyperfields, which occur as quotients of local fields. Pierre Deligne developed a different approach to the theory of limits of local fields which replaced the use of hyperfields by the use of what he termed triples, which consist of truncated discrete valuation rings plus some extra data. We study the relationship between Krasner's valued hyperfields and Deligne's triples.
Recommendations
Cites work
- From monoids to hyperstructures: in search of an absolute arithmetic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3924931 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5050432 (Why is no real title available?)
- Le corps des normes de certaines extensions infinies de corps locaux; applications
- Projective Geometries as Multigroups
- Real reduced multirings and multifields
- Relation algebras and projective geometries
- The hyperring of adèle classes
- Universal thickening of the field of real numbers
Cited in
(8)- Lattices, spectral spaces, and closure operations on idempotent semirings
- Orderings and valuations in hyperfields
- Hyperfields, truncated DVRs, and valued fields
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3924931 (Why is no real title available?)
- Valuation semirings
- Vector bundles on tropical schemes
- Notes on valuation theory for Krasner hyperfields
- On the hyperfields associated to valued fields
This page was built for publication: An equivalence between two approaches to limits of local fields
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q273486)