Analysis of Assumptions in BIG Bell Test Experiments

DOI10.1002/ANDP.202000333MaRDI QIDQ6086966zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Adam Bednorz

Publication date 14 November 2023

Published in Annalen der Physik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05503

zbMATH Keywords

Bell testlocal realismno-signaling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum theory (81-XX)

Abstract: Recently, a group of experiments tested local realism with random choices prepared by humans. These various tests were subject to additional assumptions, which lead to loopholes in the interpretations of almost all of the experiments. Among these assumptions are fair sampling, no signaling, and faithful reproduction of a Bell-type quantum model. We examined the data from 9 of 13 experiments and analyzed occurring anomalies in view of the above assumptions. We conclude that further tests of local realism need better setup calibration to avoid apparent signaling or necessity of the complicated underlying quantum model.

Cites work

• A local hidden variable model of quantum correlation exploiting the detection loophole
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3026527 (Why is no real title available?)
• Loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment via quantum steering
• PCT, spin and statistics, and all that.
• Violation of bell's inequalities in a quantum realistic framework
• Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
• Violation of local realism with freedom of choice

This page was built for publication: Analysis of Assumptions in BIG Bell Test Experiments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6086966)