Array nonrecursive degrees and lattice embeddings of the diamond
Exactly which r.e. degrees are tops of diamonds in the \(\Delta_ 2\) degrees (with the least element \textbf{0}) is an important problem. Slaman guessed that all \(\text{low}_ 2\) degrees are bounded by degrees that are not tops of diamonds in the \(\Delta_ 2\) degrees. In this paper, the author answers Slaman's question negatively. To get this result, he proves a more general theorem: If an r.e. degree is array nonrecursive, then it is the top of a diamond in the \(\Delta_ 2\) degrees. (The concept of array nonrecursiveness gives a natural class of degrees that arise from arguments which need `multiple permissions'. It has been shown that this class contains members of low degree, is closed upwards, and contains all \(\text{non-low}_ 2\) r.e. degrees.) The author also gets some results about array nonrecursive degrees.
- Dynamic notions of genericity and array noncomputability
- Splitting theorems in recursion theory
- Lattice nonembeddings and intervals of the recursively enumerable degrees
- Lattice embeddings below a nonlow\(_ 2\) recursively enumerable degree
- Diamond embeddings into the enumeration degrees
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3845570 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lattice embeddings and array noncomputable degrees
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 841084 (Why is no real title available?)
- Nonlowness is independent from fickleness
- Domination, forcing, array nonrecursiveness and relative recursive enumerability
- Embeddings of N₅ and the contiguous degrees
- Diamond lattice embedded into d.r.e. degrees
This page was built for publication: Array nonrecursive degrees and lattice embeddings of the diamond
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1320968)