Balanced complexes and complexes without large missing faces

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: The face numbers of simplicial complexes without missing faces of dimension larger than i are studied. It is shown that among all such (d−1)-dimensional complexes with non-vanishing top homology, a certain polytopal sphere has the componentwise minimal f-vector; and moreover, among all such 2-Cohen--Macaulay (2-CM) complexes, the same sphere has the componentwise minimal h-vector. It is also verified that the l-skeleton of a flag (d−1)-dimensional 2-CM complex is 2(d−l)-CM while the l-skeleton of a flag PL (d−1)-sphere is 2(d−l)-homotopy CM. In addition, tight lower bounds on the face numbers of 2-CM balanced complexes in terms of their dimension and the number of vertices are established.


This paper is about counting the faces of simplicial complexes. Two kinds of complexes are examined: complexes without missing faces, and those whose missing faces are only \(1\)-dimensional (flag complexes). The authors give lower bounds for complexes with non-vanishing top homology and no missing faces. The other results need additional conditions on the link of faces (Cohen-Macaulay complexes). Thus ``the \(l\)-skeleton of a flag \((d-1)\)-dimensional \(2\)-CM complex is \(2(d-l)\)-CM, while the \(l\)-skeleton of a flag piecewise linear \((d-1)\)-sphere is \(2(d-l)\)-homotopy CM. In addition, tight lower bounds on the face numbers of \(2\)-CM balanced complexes in terms of their dimension and the number of vertices are established.











This page was built for publication: Balanced complexes and complexes without large missing faces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q691157)