Borel complexity and potential canonical Scott sentences

From MaRDI portal




Abstract: We define and investigate HC-forcing invariant formulas of set theory, whose interpretations in the hereditarily countable sets are well behaved under forcing extensions. This leads naturally to a notion of cardinality ||Phi|| for sentences Phi of Lomega1,omega, which counts the number of sentences of Linfty,omega that, in some forcing extension, become a canonical Scott sentence of a model of Phi. We show this cardinal bounds the complexity of (Mod(Phi), iso), the class of models of Phi with universe omega, by proving that (Mod(Phi),iso) is not Borel reducible to (Mod(Psi),iso) whenever ||Psi|| < ||Phi||. Using these tools, we analyze the complexity of the class of countable models of four complete, first-order theories T for which (Mod(T),iso) is properly analytic, yet admit very different behavior. We prove that both `Binary splitting, refining equivalence relations' and Koerwien's example of an eni-depth 2, omega-stable theory have (Mod(T),iso) non-Borel, yet neither is Borel complete. We give a slight modification of Koerwien's example that also is omega-stable, eni-depth 2, but is Borel complete. Additionally, we prove that I_{infty,omega}(Phi)<�eth_{omega_1} whenever (Mod(Phi),iso) is Borel.











This page was built for publication: Borel complexity and potential canonical Scott sentences

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5348072)