Boundary stabilization of Timoshenko beam
The author begins with the following and commonly accepted Timoshenko's model: \[ \begin{aligned} & w_{tt}-(Kw')' +(K\varphi)'=0\;('\equiv \partial/\partial x),\;\ell>x>0,\;t>0,\\ & I_\rho \varphi_{tt}-EI \varphi+K (\varphi-w')=0,\quad I_\rho= R\rho(x),\;EI(x)>0.\\ & \text{with }w(0,t)= \varphi(0,t)=0 \text{ (clamped at left end)}.\end{aligned} \] The boundary conditions at the right end, i.e. \(\{x\in (\ell,t)\}\), are \[ K\varphi (\ell,t)-w' (\ell,t) \in f_1(\partial/ \partial t\;w(\ell,t)),\text{ and }-EI\varphi'(\ell,t)\in f_2(\partial/ \partial t w (\ell,t)). \] The usual physical meanings assigned to the various symbols appearing here have been explained in previous reviews [see for example \textit{M. A. Shubov}'s article, ``Exact controllability of damped Timoshenko beam, IMA J. Math. Control Inf. 17, 375-395 (2000; Zbl 0991.93016)]. Here \(f_1(\partial/ \partial t w (\ell,t))\), \(f_2(\partial/ \partial t \varphi (\ell,t))\) are the control force and control moment, respectively, applied at the free end. The only difference between the initial-boundary value problem posed by Shubov and by this author is Shubov's assumption of direct proportionality, rather than the choice of more general functions \(f_1\), \(f_2\) of the present author. These functions are assumed to be maximal monotone, and such that near zero the functions \(f_i(\xi)\) lie between two bounded exponential curves, neither one of which assumes value zero at zero or in the vicinity of zero. The author defines the energy of the system \(E(t)\), which is in agreement with other papers on this topic, and then pursues a different and original path by designing a Lyapunov function \(F(t)=\mu tE(t) +G(t)\) such that \(G(t)\) depends on an integral of quadratic terms multiplied by constants, which in turn depend only on multiples of various quadratic terms. Use of Sobolev's embedding theorem and a lengthy and difficult calculation permit the author to conclude that \(F\) is indeed a Lyapunov function and to show that the total energy of the beam decreases exponentially under the proposed feedback control action.
- Uniform decay in a Timoshenko-type system with past history
- Asymptotic behavior of Timoshenko beam with dissipative boundary feedback
- Well-posedness and asymptotic behavior of Timoshenko beam system with dynamic boundary dissipative feedback of fractional derivative type
- Boundary stabilization of non-classical micro-scale beams
- Nonlinear boundary stabilization of nonuniform Timoshenko beam
- Boundary feedback stabilization of Kirchhoff-type Timoshenko system
- A Timoshenko beam with tip body and boundary damping
- On the stabilization of Timoshenko systems with memory and different speeds of wave propagation
- Stabilization of Timoshenko beam with dissipative boundary feedback
- Stabilization of Euler-Bernoulli beam with a nonlinear locally distributed feedback control
- Boundary stabilization of a Bresse-type system
- On the stabilization of the Timoshenko system by a weak nonlinear dissipation
- Boundary Control of the Timoshenko Beam
- Energy decay rates for a Timoshenko system with viscoelastic boundary conditions
- Modeling and boundary stabilization of a multiple beam system
- Boundary stabilization of a microbeam model
- Exponential stability for a Timoshenko-type system with history
- General energy decay rates for a weakly damped Timoshenko system
This page was built for publication: Boundary stabilization of Timoshenko beam
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2721955)
