Calibration, Sufficiency, and Domination Considerations for Bayesian Probability Assessors

DOI10.2307/2288189MaRDI QIDQ3313115zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Glen Meeden, Stephen B. Vardeman

Publication date 1983

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2288189

zbMATH Keywords

calibrationcomparison of experimentsdominationlikelihoodmore informationprobability assessorssemicalibrationsufficiencytransition probabilities

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Bayesian inference (62F15)

Recommendations

• A general method for comparing probability assessors
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4074172
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3930111
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4043029
• Calibration-based empirical probability

Cited in

(9)

• Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
• The group calibration index: a group-based approach for assessing forecasters' expertise when external outcome data are missing
• On the ordering of probability forecasts
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3930111 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4043029 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4074172 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 823333 (Why is no real title available?)
• On setting response criteria for calibrated subjective probability estimates
• To protect or not to protect: Bayes decisions with forecasts

This page was built for publication: Calibration, Sufficiency, and Domination Considerations for Bayesian Probability Assessors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3313115)