Classical three-box paradox
From MaRDI portal
Classical three-box paradox
Abstract: A simple classical probabilistic system (a simple card game) classically exemplifies Aharonov and Vaidman's "Three-Box 'paradox'" [J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991)], implying that the Three-Box example is neither quantal nor a paradox and leaving one less difficulty to busy the interpreters of quantum mechanics. An ambiguity in the usual expression of the retrodiction formula is shown to have misled Albert, Aharonov, and D'Amato [Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 5 (1985)] to a result not, in fact, "curious"; the discussion illustrates how to avoid this ambiguity.
Recommendations
Cited in
(15)- Weak values and quantum properties
- Comment on Time asymmetry in quantum mechanics: a retrodiction paradox by Asher Peres. With a reply by Peres
- Interpreting weak value amplification with a toy realist model
- Measurements, disturbances and the quantum three box paradox
- Counterfactual reasoning in time-symmetric quantum mechanics
- Experimental realization of the quantum box problem
- Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes, measurement-disturbance and contextuality
- Weak values are quantum: you can bet on it
- The three-box paradox revisited
- Reply to ‘The three-box paradox revisited’ by T Ravon and L Vaidman
- Logical pre- and post-selection paradoxes are proofs of contextuality
- Shutters, Boxes, but No Paradoxes: Time Symmetry Puzzles in Quantum Theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2233198 (Why is no real title available?)
- Path integrals, the ABL rule and the three-box paradox
- Hidden measurements, hidden variables and the volume representation of transition probabilities
This page was built for publication: Classical three-box paradox
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4707609)