Comparative analysis for robust penalized spline smoothing methods
Summary: Smoothing noisy data is commonly encountered in engineering domain, and currently robust penalized regression spline models are perceived to be the most promising methods for coping with this issue, due to their flexibilities in capturing the nonlinear trends in the data and effectively alleviating the disturbance from the outliers. Against such a background, this paper conducts a thoroughly comparative analysis of two popular robust smoothing techniques, the \(M\)-type estimator and \(S\)-estimation for penalized regression splines, both of which are reelaborated starting from their origins, with their derivation process reformulated and the corresponding algorithms reorganized under a unified framework. Performances of these two estimators are thoroughly evaluated from the aspects of fitting accuracy, robustness, and execution time upon the MATLAB platform. Elaborately comparative experiments demonstrate that robust penalized spline smoothing methods possess the capability of resistance to the noise effect compared with the nonrobust penalized LS spline regression method. Furthermore, the \(M\)-estimator exerts stable performance only for the observations with moderate perturbation error, whereas the \(S\)-estimator behaves fairly well even for heavily contaminated observations, but consuming more execution time. These findings can be served as guidance to the selection of appropriate approach for smoothing the noisy data.
- \(M\)-type smoothing splines with auxiliary scale estimation
- A comparison of regression spline smoothing procedures
- Practical smoothing. The joys of P-splines
- Robust penalized regression spline fitting with application to additive mixed modelling
- Smoothing parameter selection in two frameworks for penalized splines
- A statistical perspective on ill-posed inverse problems (with discussion)
- Asymptotics for M-type smoothing splines
- Flexible Parsimonious Smoothing and Additive Modeling
- Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3829050 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3905646 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6416756 (Why is no real title available?)
- Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing
- Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models
- Miscellanea. On the optimal amount of smoothing in penalised spline regression
- Period Analysis of Variable Stars by Robust Smoothing
- Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter
- Robust penalized regression spline fitting with application to additive mixed modelling
- Robust Statistics
- Semiparametric Regression
- Simultaneous non-parametric regressions of unbalanced longitudinal data
- Smoothing noisy data for irregular regions using penalized bivariate splines on triangulations
- Smoothing noisy data with spline functions: Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross-validation
- Smoothing Parameter Selection in Nonparametric Regression Using an Improved Akaike Information Criterion
- Some Comments on C P
- The Breakdown Point of Simultaneous General M Estimates of Regression and Scale
- The Fitting of Power Series, Meaning Polynomials, Illustrated on Band-Spectroscopic Data
- The Identification of Multiple Outliers
- Thin Plate Regression Splines
This page was built for publication: Comparative analysis for robust penalized spline smoothing methods
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1718843)
