Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for Dementia
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Prediction of dementia using screening and diagnosis history in longitudinal two-phase studies
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1754077
- Testing increasing hazard rate for the progression time of dementia
- Assessing Accuracy of a Continuous Screening Test in the Presence of Verification Bias
- Estimating age-specific incidence of dementia using prevalent cohort data
- Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
- Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
Cited in
(19)- The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests
- Computational methods to simultaneously compare the predictive values of two diagnostic tests with missing data: EM-SEM algorithms and multiple imputation
- Correlation-Adjusted Estimation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Diagnostic Tests
- EM and SEM algorithms to compare the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification and discrete covariates
- Risk of error and the kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test in the presence of partial verification
- Comparing diagnostic tests with missing data
- Asymptotic hypothesis test to simultaneously compare the weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests in the presence of ignorable missing data
- Bayesian interval estimation for the difference in TPRs and FPRs of two diagnostic tests with unverified negatives
- Prediction of dementia using screening and diagnosis history in longitudinal two-phase studies
- EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified
- Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives
- Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease
- Sample size calculation for comparing two screening tests when the gold standard is missing at random
- Weighted McNemar's test for the comparison of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias
- Weighted generalized score test for comparing predictive values in the presence of verification bias
- Optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing accuracies of two binary classification rules
- Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
- Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
- Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
This page was built for publication: Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for Dementia
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4216167)
