Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.200900143MaRDI QIDQ2786172zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Thomas Mathew, Kenneth Nordström

Publication date 21 September 2010

Published in Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200900143

zbMATH Keywords

fixed effectscovariatesrandom effectsbalancetreatment-control difference

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50) Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12)

Recommendations

• On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data
• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis
• Validity of regression meta-analyses versus pooled analyses of mixed effect linear models
• Models for Combining Results of Different Experiments: Retrospective and Prospective

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3176492 (Why is no real title available?)
• Combining Experiments Under Gauss-Markov Models
• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• Generalized least squares for the synthesis of correlated information
• Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications
• On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data
• The design of multicentre trials

Cited in

(13)

• Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis
• Using aggregate data to estimate the standard error of a treatment--covariate interaction in an individual patient data meta-analysis
• Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
• One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information
• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• An evaluation of treatment-covariate interaction in meta-analysis with marginalizing of missing individual patient data
• Meta-analysis of Gaussian individual patient data: two-stage or not two-stage?
• Combining individual participant data and summary statistics from both continuously valued and binary variables to estimate regression parameters
• Efficient integration of aggregate data and individual participant data in one-way mixed models
• On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data
• Multiple imputation for multilevel data with continuous and binary variables
• A stage-wise approach for the analysis of multi-environment trials
• Meta-analysis of clinical trials with competing time-to-event endpoints

This page was built for publication: Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2786172)