On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data

DOI10.1111/J.0006-341X.1999.01221.XMaRDI QIDQ4668335zbMATH OpenWikidataFDO

Authors Thomas Mathew, Kenneth Nordström

Publication date 18 April 2005

Published in Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0006-341X.1999.01221.X

zbMATH Keywords

best linear unbiased estimatormeta-analysis of literaturemeta-analysis of patientstreatment-control comparisontwo-way model without interaction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Recommendations

• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• Validity of regression meta-analyses versus pooled analyses of mixed effect linear models
• Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data
• On random-effects meta-analysis
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2172878

Cites work

• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data

Cited in

(11)

• Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information
• Hans van Houwelingen and the art of summing up
• Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data
• Validity of regression meta-analyses versus pooled analyses of mixed effect linear models
• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis
• Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis
• A hierarchical meta-analysis for settings involving multiple outcomes across multiple cohorts
• Efficient integration of aggregate data and individual participant data in one-way mixed models
• Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data
• Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ

This page was built for publication: On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4668335)