Composite values of shifted exponentials

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: A well-known open problem asks to show that 2n+5 is composite for almost all values of n. This was proposed by Gil Kalai as a possible Polymath project, and was posed originally by Christopher Hooley. We show that, assuming GRH and a form of the pair correlation conjecture, the answer to this problem is affirmative. We in fact do not need the full power of the pair correlation conjecture, and it suffices to assume a generalization of the Brun-Titchmarsh inequality for the Chebotarev density theorem that is implied by it. Our methods apply to any shifted exponential sequence of the form an−b and show that, under the same assumptions, such numbers are k-almost primes for a density 0 of natural numbers n. Furthermore, we show that ap−b is composite for almost all primes p whenever (a,b)eq(2,1).


Even though the questions on infinitude of primes of the form \(2^n+1\) or of the form \(2^n-1\) are open, it is clear that the exponents \(n\) for which primaility holds, have natural density \(0\). In passing, we mention that it is widely believed that the number of primes of the form \(2^n-1\) is expected to be infinite, while the number of primes of the form \(2^n+1\) is expected to be only finite. However, it is not even known if there are infinitely many composite values of \(2^p-1\) where \(p\) runs over primes. \textit{C. Hooley} had proved almost five decades back (in his book [Applications of sieve methods to the theory of numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1976; Zbl 0327.10044)]) that, for any \(n\), that \(2^n-b\) is composite for almost all \(n\) (in the sense of natural density) under the assumption of GRH and certain other hypotheses. He had also proposed the problem of proving compositeness of \(2^n+5\) for almost all \(n\). Four decades later, Bourgain-Gamburd-Sarnak studied the compositeness of the Markoff numbers using affine sieve methods and the so-called superstrong approximation [\textit{J. Bourgain} et al., C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris 354, No. 2, 131--135 (2016; Zbl 1378.11043)]. Sarnak also connected the affine sieve method to Hooley's question. In the paper under review, the authors prove Hooley's conjecture of compositeness of \(2^n+5\) for almost all \(n\), under the GRH, and another hypothesis that is a type of Brun-Titchmarsh estimate on the average. More generally, they treat the sequence \(a^n-b\) for any integers \(a>1\) and \(b\). Further, they show that even something like \(k\)-almost primeness for any \(k\) can hold only for exponents of density \(0\). More precisely, they prove that for coprime integers \(a>1, b \neq 0\), there is a constant \(c=c(a,b)>0\) such that the natural density of integers \(n\) with \(\omega(a^n-b) \geq c \log \log n\), equals \(1\). Interestingly, the authors' methods allow them to restrict to special exponents like primes. In particular, they are able to prove under the GRH and the average Brun-Titchmarsh estimate alluded to above that for integers \(a>1\) and \(b\) -- other than \((2,1)\) -- the relative density of primes \(p\) such that \(a^p-b\) is composite, equals \(1\). The authors use GRH in a particular situation, and the Brun-Titchmarsh hypothesis they require is a consequence of the pair correlation conjecture. This paper represents a powerful piece of work.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Composite values of shifted exponentials

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6175956)