Computing jumping numbers in higher dimensions

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: The aim of this paper is to generalize the algorithm to compute jumping numbers on rational surfaces described in [AAD14] to varieties of dimension at least 3. Therefore, we introduce the notion of pi-antieffective divisors, generalizing antinef divisors. Using these divisors, we present a way to find a small subset of the `classical' candidate jumping numbers of an ideal, containing all the jumping numbers. Moreover, many of these numbers are automatically jumping numbers, and in many other cases, it can be easily checked.


Let \(X\) by a smooth projective variety, \(\mathfrak{a}\) an ideal sheaf on \(X\) and \(\pi: Y\to X\) a log resolution of the pair \((X,\mathfrak{a})\). Let \(F\) be the Cartier divisor such that \(\mathfrak{a}\cdot\mathcal{O}_Y=\mathcal{O}_Y(-F)\) and \(K_{\pi}=K_Y-\pi^*K_X\). For a non-negative number \(c\), one can associate to \(\mathfrak{a}\) a multiplier ideal sheaf \(\mathcal{J}(X, \mathfrak{a}^c)=\pi_*\mathcal{O}_Y(K_\pi-\lfloor cF\rfloor)\) which measures the complexity of the singularity of \(\mathfrak{a}\). When the values of \(c\) increases, the multiplier ideal may change. The values of \(c\) such that the multiplier ideal changes are known as the jumping numbers of the pair \((X, \mathfrak{a})\). In the paper under review, the authors generalize the algorithm for computing the jumping numbers on rational surfaces in [\textit{M. Alberich-Carramiñana} et al., Michigan Math. J. 65, No. 2, 287--320 (2016; Zbl 1357.14025)] to the higher dimensional varieties. The algorithm starts with computing supercandidates and then check whether they are jumping number. To compute supercandiates, which forms a set containing the set of jumping numbers (Theorem 4.4), the authors first generalize \(\pi\)-antinef divisors on surfaces to \(\pi\)-antieffective divisors to higher dimension and show that every divisor \(D\) has a unique \(\pi\)-antieffective closure (Theorem 3.4). Starting with the first supercandiate, the log canonical threshold which is the smallest jumping number, the set of supercandidates is constructed inductively by adding the number \(\min\limits_{i}\left\{\frac{k_1+1+e_i^{\lambda}}{e_i}\right\}\) if \(D_\lambda = \sum\limits_i e_i^{\lambda}E_i\) is the \(\pi\)-antieffective closure of \(\lfloor cF\rfloor-K_\pi\). Associate to a supercandidate \(\lambda\), the authors define the minimal jumping divisor \(G_\lambda\) to be the reduced divisor supported on the components \(E_i\) where \(\min\limits_{i}\left\{\frac{k_1+1+e_i^{\lambda}}{e_i}\right\}=\frac{k_1+1+e_i^{\lambda}}{e_i}\). A necessary condition that a supercandidate \(\lambda\) is a jumping number is that the minimal jumping divisor \(G_\lambda\) contributes \(\lambda\) (Proposition 4.7) that is \(\mathcal{J}(X,\mathfrak{a}^\lambda)\subsetneq \pi_*\mathcal{O}_Y(K_\pi-\lfloor \lambda F\rfloor + G_\lambda)\). A sufficient condition is that \(G_\lambda\) has a connected component which is irreducible. Based on this criterion and the idea of looking for contributing divisors, the authors propose algorithms to determine whether a supercandidate is a jumping number in different situations. However, due to the unknown correspondence between \(\pi\)-antieffective divisors and integrally closed ideals in higher dimensions, it is not known whether all supercandidates are actual jumping numbers. The authors also provide examples on how to implement the algorithm.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Computing jumping numbers in higher dimensions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2285834)