Consistent histories, quantum truth functionals, and hidden variables
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: A central principle of consistent histories quantum theory, the requirement that quantum descriptions be based upon a single framework (or family), is employed to show that there is no conflict between consistent histories and a no-hidden-variables theorem of Bell, and Kochen and Specker, contrary to a recent claim by Bassi and Ghirardi. The argument makes use of ``truth functionals defined on a Boolean algebra of classical or quantum properties.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1278484 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 872244 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
- Comment on “Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory”
- Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I: Foundations
- On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
Cited in
(7)- Branch dependence in the ``Consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics
- Quantum histories without contrary inferences
- On noncontextual, non-Kolmogorovian hidden variable theories
- Consistent quantum measurements
- The consistent histories formalism and the measurement problem
- Dynamical reduction models
- Probability sum rules and consistent quantum histories
This page was built for publication: Consistent histories, quantum truth functionals, and hidden variables
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1569492)