Decidable modal logic with undecidable admissibility problem
The admissibility problem for a given logic \(L\) is to determine whether an arbitrary given inference rule \(A_ 1(p_ 1,\dots,p_ n),\dots,A_ m(p_ 1,\dots,p_ n)/B(p_ 1,\dots,p_ n)\) is admissible in \(L\), i.e., for all formulas \(C_ 1,\dots,C_ n\), \(B(C_ 1,\dots,C_ n)\in L\) whenever \(A_ 1(C_ 1,\dots,C_ n)\in L,\dots,A_ m(C_ 1,\dots,C_ n)\in L\). As is known, V. Rybakov proved the decidability of the admissibility problem for a number of intermediate and modal logics. In this paper, the author constructs a decidable normal modal logic for which the admissibility problem is undecidable. The logic is an extension of K4 of width 3 and has infinitely many axioms.
- Proof theory for admissible rules
- The decidability of admissibility problems for modal logics S4.2 and S4.2Grz and superintuitionistic logic KC
- Criteria for admissibility of inference rules. Modal and intermediate logics with the branching property
- On rules
- Tutorial on admissible rules in Gudauri
- Canonical rules
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2024620 (Why is no real title available?)
- DECIDABILITY OF ADMISSIBILITY: ON A PROBLEM BY FRIEDMAN AND ITS SOLUTION BY RYBAKOV
- The context of inference
- Multiple conclusion rules in logics with the disjunction property
- The Deduction Theorem (Before and After Herbrand)
- Decidable and Undecidable Problems for First-Order Definability and Modal Definability
- Undecidability of admissibility in the product of two \textbf{Alt} logics
- Complexity of admissible rules
This page was built for publication: Decidable modal logic with undecidable admissibility problem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2366361)