Defective 3-paintability of planar graphs
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: A -defective -painting game on a graph is played by two players: Lister and Painter. Initially, each vertex is uncolored and has tokens. In each round, Lister marks a chosen set of uncolored vertices and removes one token from each marked vertex. In response, Painter colors vertices in a subset of which induce a subgraph of maximum degree at most . Lister wins the game if at the end of some round there is an uncolored vertex that has no more tokens left. Otherwise, all vertices eventually get colored and Painter wins the game. We say that is -defective -paintable if Painter has a winning strategy in this game. In this paper we show that every planar graph is 3-defective 3-paintable and give a construction of a planar graph that is not 2-defective 3-paintable.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1250667 (Why is no real title available?)
- Defective colorings of graphs in surfaces: Partitions into subgraphs of bounded valency
- Every planar graph is 5-choosable
- List Improper Colourings of Planar Graphs
- List colourings of planar graphs
- Locally planar graphs are 2-defective 4-paintable
- Mr. Paint and Mrs. Correct
- On-line list colouring of graphs
- Planar graphs are 1-relaxed, 4-choosable
Cited in
(6)- Decomposing planar graphs into graphs with degree restrictions
- The Alon-Tarsi number of planar graphs without cycles of lengths 4 and \(l\)
- The Alon-Tarsi number of a planar graph minus a matching
- Weak (2, 3)-decomposition of planar graphs
- Every planar graph is 1-defective \((9,2)\)-paintable
- Locally planar graphs are 2-defective 4-paintable
This page was built for publication: Defective 3-paintability of planar graphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1753126)