Destroying cycles in digraphs
Every 3-free tournament is acyclic. The present paper investigates the following question: If a simple 3-free digraph is obtained from a tournament by deleting \(k\) edges, what is the minimum number of additional edges that must be deleted in order to obtain an acyclic digraph? The result improves some earlier upper bounds by other researchers (\textit{M. Chudnovsky, P. Seymour} and \textit{B. Sullivan} [Combinatorica 28, 1--18 (2008; Zbl 1174.05049)], \textit{P. Hamburger, P. Haxell} and \textit{A. Kostochka} [Electron. J. Comb. 14, No. 1, Research Paper N19 (2007; Zbl 1157.05311)]) but does not prove the conjecture that each \(n\)-vertex digraph with minimum outdegree at least \(n/3\) contains a directed triangle (\textit{L. Caccetta} and \textit{R. Häggkvist} [Congressus Numerantium XXI, 181--187 (1978; Zbl 0406.05033)]).
- Destroying longest cycles in graphs and digraphs
- Cycle decompositions of complete digraphs
- Decompositions of digraphs into paths and cycles
- Cyclically decomposing the complete graph into cycles
- Cycles in dense digraphs
- On removable cycles in graphs and digraphs
- Cycle decompositions of complete graphs
- Consistent cycles in graphs and digraphs
- Decomposing various graphs into short even-length cycles
- Publication:4726282
This page was built for publication: Destroying cycles in digraphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q653984)